Cv
The reaction flows into after the Kyle Rittenhouse Opportance while Ahmaud Arbery Case Continues.alex Jones and Roger Stone will be hit by the Commission's summons on January 6.The former Senator Barbara Boxer discusses the Build Back Better Act.
transcription
Nicolle Wallace, MSNBC -Host: The Beat with Ari Melber starts now.
Do I see.
Ari Melber, MSNBC Host: Hallo, Nicolle.Many Please.
Welcome to De Beat.I'm Ari Melber.
We follow that Breaking News Nicolle only refers to this new summons to Roger Stone and prominent right -wing figures.Provision of the fact that Doj is willing to send people to prison to enter this kind of summons.
So I will bring you all with legal expertise from Neal and others.
But we start with our top story.
Conservative leaders have celebrated that the jury acquittal of the teenager who killed two.Try three men who are accused and accused of killing an unpredicted jogger.
Now these murderers, all white and the unarmed man, Ahmaud Arbery, are black and there is no denial about what happened.
But they claim that without proof that they actually did it at the time.
(Start with video clips)
Linda Dunikoski, Cobb County, Georgia, Assistant District Attorney: A Citizen judgment is for emergency situations when a crime really happens for you and you can suddenly and intervene to arrest someone because you know it.You just entered.
If it is a crime, you can run after the person and chase him.
This was not an arrest of the citizen.arbery every crime that day.
(End of video clips)
Melber: This is important here and we will ensure that you understand exactly what the evidence shows.
It is in fact the public prosecutor that this did not happen, no citizen arrests, and it did not even claim to happen because it was not said at that time.
What is the counter -argument now?
(Start with video clips)
Jason Sheffield, lawyer for Travis McMichael: reasonable and probably because of suspicion, facts and circ*mstances of warning a cautious person who ensures the truth of believing that the suspect has committed the violation of burglary.
And a citizen is in the same shoes as an officer when it comes to the arrest of the citizen.
(End of video clips)
Melber: listen carefully and you can hear the contours of a new and legally extreme demand for vigilant murder.
The lawyer for the men who killed this on arm jogging says they felt like the police so that they can kill as a police.
Now I have to deal with this very simple police.Requires the same forces from the air by declaring itself in the process of a secret arrest of the citizen.
If this sounds extreme, it is because it is.I can tell you that there is not much law that supports this.
And this is something the persecution that I want to show you now, shot very creepy and the jury tells something that is true.Now the jury has the ultimate decision in our system about whether this was murder.-Control, where what the lawyer says here.
These murderers were not a police, not in their own thoughts, not in the eyes of the law, and certainly not in their actions.
(Start with video clips)
Dunikoski: They are not law enforcement agencies.
(End of video clips)
[18:05:08]
Melber: "No civil judgment."
The whole thing will be tested.This jury must make a decision.Now, as a legal case, this case, the Arbery -Trial case against in principle the people who killed him have no formal legal connection with this acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse.
But if you listen, you may notice that some arguments clearly overlap.Situation that they, the murderer, provoked and escalated.
Now it is the fact that the lawyers pronounced it in this specific case, because they were three armed men in a car who pursued an unnecessary man, and the jury hears the persecution point, not only with evidence or common logical arguments.
At some point, this - these charges literally just said - quotation - "Come on. Let's really be."
(Start with video clips)
Dunikoski: Gregory McMichael had his gun.Travis McMichael you told you.He had his gun.Diego had his gun.Brooke had his gun.Everything had a gun.
And what has almost happened?I mean, come now.If we really become.
(End of video clips)
Melber: "Let's really become."
That is what this jury should weigh.
In the meantime, in the second case in Wisconsin weigh some of the most influential voices that Rittenhouse is not guilty.
But some throw the murderer as a kind of justified public employee who has maintained other amendment values.
(Start with video clips)
Laura Ingraham, Fox News: designed was the only judgment that was logical.
Tucker Carlson, Fox News: That is why there were riots in Kenosha that evening because people like Kamala Harris supported these riots.
Lara Logan, Fox News: Kyle Rittenhouse had never sued.
Greg Gutfeld, Fox News: It was a victory for self -defense.
Leo Terrell, Fox News: Joe Biden, the Democrat, used Kyle Rittenhouse.The public prosecutor who should never prosecute another case ...
Jeanine Pirro, Fox News: I agree.
Terrell: ... Run - tried that matter as a political process.
(End of video clips)
Melber: And there is news about how Tucker Carlson was embedded during the process of a FOX News project with Rittenhouse, where his crew drove in a car with Rittenhouse just after the verdict and after that time together, the first interview since thejudgment.
Now the whole piece has not yet been released.So nobody knows the entire content or approach.
(Start with video clips)
Carlson: Our documentary team was in Kenosha when it happened.
And today they caught the first moments of the field of Kyle Rittenhouse after they have been acquitted.
(Start with video clips)
Kyle Rittenhouse, accused: these are the things that keep you awake at night.
(End of video clips)
Melber: We see the content circle here in real time because it is much of the wrong information that has led to some people doing things that have honestly not thought differently.
There is a connection between all the talk about weapons and great lies and violence and the oversore of the government and the so -called quote "riot" and what we see stops.And in real time we see the increase in someone who was in court for a very serious crime and was acquitted.
And under our system we respect the result of these jury poems.But the result is very different from taking the rest.
All this happens while these other cases remain open.Many no self-defense, but self-miser, co-armed people who kill unarmed people, sometimes on racial lines, where many of them are also signed by juries from our colleagues.
To help answer this question, we partly bring Maya Wiley, a former Civil Prosecutor and Mayor of New York City, and Marq Kaxton, a retired NYPD detective and director of the Black Law Enforcement Alliance.
Welcome to both of you.
Marq, your views legally about the defense in this Arbery case, the idea that if some people want the police, they have the powers of the police.
[18:10:02]
Marq Kaxton, Black Law Enforcement Alliance: Well, Van Bats, of course I am not a lawyer, but common sense tells me that people who work under the color of the law without the right authority are questions and worries.
It is clear in the case of Arbery, as is the case in Rittenhouse, it is clear that individuals are convinced that they can be known when it brings problems with Black Life or Black interests.
And they become brave enough to say, not only we can self -develop, but we can really adjust the strategy that the police captures use and say, in fact, do not consider what the events have set up.The incident took place and then consider whether the person was justified in the violation in this case.
And it limits and narrows - what they are trying to do is limit and limit the focus of the jury on the few seconds and to give people to discuss whether it was justified, without taking into account the provocation or not.
Melber: Yes, the concept.
And I heard that you mention that you do not see yourself there as a complete authority, even if we do that, given your experience as a police officer and in civil rights.
And Maya, Marq can talk to how police departments look at this.
And I just want to throw in the reason why police services have these extra authorities, precisely because of the system.
But as a lawyer I have certainly never heard of the idea that if you feel like a policeman, you get all these rights in a magical way, Maya.
Maya Wiley, MSNBC Legal Analyst: Yes, that's right.
And as you looked up in the beginning, Ari, that is exactly what the persecution was difficult for, namely, see if you are standing there - and by the way, it would be - it is important to say - this is not a longer Georgia legislation,Because it is so dangerous and what happened to Ahmaud Arbery, no more arrest law of citizens, who is honestly based on black people who are suspected of being slaves that people would return to the plantation.forget.
But what we saw in the defense, after this public prosecutor said very professionally, see, no crime in progress, was not necessary to hunt him to stop a crime that they had direct knowledge was when it was legalThe arrest of a citizen would be.And in this case it was what you heard of the defense what I call the White Fear defense.
We want to tell a largely white jury that only a black member, look, went down the neighborhood.He jogs through the neighborhood.
Melber: Right.
Wiley: So it was therefore an effective persecution.
And this is the connection with Kyle Rittenhouse whether you walk around with a gun and identify yourself as someone who is law enforcement, even if you are not.
Melber: Right.
And it goes to Catch-22 that some of these decisions seem to offer people who are the person with the gun that uses self-defense.And I think that someone without legal education can relate to the idea that if someone comes to you and trying to kill you with a mortal weapon - then you would exercise self -defense.
And in one way or another it is twisted in these cases that must be offered as a justification for killing.
I would like to play a little more of the public prosecutor in the Arbery case about this.
(Start with video clips)
Dunikoski: They shot and killed Ahmud Arbery.
They all acted as a party for crime.You will find that they are being sued in this way.Accused of murder, crime murder and the four crimes that led to the murder.
(End of video clips)
Melber: That is how the persecution really closes.
There is a lot of coverage of this test that has been noted here, in the Arbery case, the charges have not explicitly stated the questions of Ras, although there is bad evidence of the documented racism of the defendants.
In the case of Rittenhouse, it was also complex in the sense that it was about a BLM, although the victims, the decadents - -on a supportive black lifelaterie -were on the point.
[18:15:05]
Rittenhouse, which now speaks in the Tucker interview I mentioned, asks for everything we hear from him after the process.
(Start with video clips)
Rittenhouse: This case has nothing to do with race.
Carlson: Right.
Rittenhouse: I am not a racist person.I support the BLM movement.
I think there are not only many prosecutors in my case, but in other cases.
(End of video clips)
Melber: Maya?
Wiley: don't buy it.
It sounds like a good P.R.-Process after the process.
But remember what is so important to understand about race in America, it is not that racism only damages people who are black.Think that the legal system should solve when they demonstrate, the police see a young man with a semi -automatic gun and offers him a bottle of water and thank him for the fact that he is there, even after the evening clock.
It has everything to do with Race, because, as we know, he could not even have killed the Lord or Mr. Huber if these police officers had done their work that evening.
Melber: one.
And Marq, it gives you the last thought that not everything should be implemented via a racing filter.Now acquitted, who killed two people that night.
But of course, if you want to ask the question, you could of course ask what the police and the state's response would be, a 17-year-old was part of a new state, illegally obtained a weapon, brands and walks around with an AR- 15 If the 17 -year -old Louden were different in a way if they were black.
And I say that are not provocative, but because we have made the data about how different this treatment is in general.
Your thoughts, Marq.
Kaxton: well, just to emphasize the point today is the seventh anniversary of the killing of Tamir Rice, the young black man with the toy gun.
So there is the answer.
Melber: twelve years old at the same time, yes.
TRAXTON: Twelve years old at the same time.
So if you want to know what the answer is under normal circ*mstances, at least what it is about black people, it is.And I think, but domestic terrorists are individuals who enter into hate crimes such as vigilance.
I think that vigilant, when I think about it, think of individuals who essentially think that the ultimate goal is really more important than the means they use it, but it is always all about justice.
Sometimes I think, and especially these cases that there was nothing, was just the unfair injustice and unfair acts that led to the death of individuals.
So I think we do a bear service if we call it as vigilance in this case.If you work and work against black interest.
Melber: all such important points and these are heavy things.
And I will again mention the accuracy for the viewers in the Arbery case, of course there is a separate problem with a hate crime that is not yet a lawsuit that goes to the underlying proof of documented racism.
Whether it is a legal strategy based on their views on the jury, their job is to win.
I want to thank Marq Kaxton and Maya Wiley for kicking us, and then tell everyone what we came because I said they are breaking news for you.
And boy, it is big, new on January 6's summons against Roger Stone, previously convicted and granted by Trump, and Alex Jones, who was recently in his own legal problems about lies in court.
And later Joe Biden won great.
And at the end of the hour, because you know we are confusing it, I know you know him when you read criminal thrillers.
[18:20:04]
James Patterterson, the only one, is here tonight in the hour.
(Commercial break)
Melber: Breaking News that our news room became short before the beat was broadcast.
Alex Jones and Roger Stone both newly summarized from the Congress of January 6 -Committee. The Eying Stone's dedication to rallies that are held in Washington the day before, January 5, plus his recruitment of various Eath -keepermilite members as guards.involved in the rebellion.
This committee was also interested in the schedule of Stone.
Roger Stone is Donald Trump's longest political adviser and he has had many problems with crime.went inside.
With Trump the office outside, Stone no longer has that kind of play -offs if he wants to play a chicken game with this selection or doj.
Another new summons for Alex Jones, the documented conspiracy theoreticist and right -wing Roerder, the committee in eye gear, he reportedly received from the White House about a demonstration of Capitol.is planning to meet Jones or his group too.
[18:25:02]
And "The Wall Street Journal" reports that Jones helped to get financing before January 6 -it is a big thing because it is about how this thing was organized, planned, supported by Top.nu is this not the first legal problem ofJones.Had some legal fights in the large lawsuits that lasted for years to win by the courts brought by Sandy Hook -parents.
So you have these two people and three others also touch new subpoenas from the committee.
Neal Katyal is, as promised, here to get in.
We are back after our shortest break in 60 seconds.
(Commercial break)
Melber: I am now with the former acting American lawyer Neal Katyal.
We reported news that Brrak broke out of the committee on January 6 and published a new summons, including against Roger Stone and Alex Jones.
Dine Tanker, Neal?
Neal Katyal, MSNBC Legal Analyst: So I think Ari is a sign of an even more mature, serious study and I am very happy to see this summons.
At the same time I will send caution.
For me, the most important point, Ari, is about the summons that they are not just about these five individuals.
And I just want to read a part of it for our viewers.
It is - quote - "As you said, the White House told you, Alex Jones, on January 6 you should lead a march to Capitol where President Trump would meet the group."
So according to this house letter, Trump should be in Capitol on January 6, and what they do is, they try to search for information about it and about the presence of Trump on January 6.
It is a rather striking new explanation for me.
Melber: very, very important that you identify it.
Of course it was announced that Donald Trump publicly claimed that he would go to the capital.Violent rebellion.
Is your assumption or interpretation that the Commission must have further evidence or documentation of this plan?
Katyal: JA, Precies.
And it seems that many people were read in the plan.So this was not just a kind of Donald Trump at the last minute he would do.Fully standing plan?
And when you have people like Alex Jones and Roger Stone, who are not exactly known to keep the law, you have to wonder - and it's not as they are - that he sowing together with mother Teresa or sowing something.serious .
And then I think this summons is starting to reach.
So Alex Joneses is the world and Roger Stones of the World must know that they will be given a criminal prosecution, just as Steve Bannon is.
Melber: Yes, this is another important point that you travel and to the person you are dealing here.
Doj has now proven that it will appeal.These men are both liars.
I say that because Jones was found as a liar by the civil courts, to commit defamation and get many problems about it.What in turn is different from other things he might have said in another forum that was misleading but not illegal, criminal.
[18:30:11]
Here he is a criminal liar.?
How does it influence a path to the potential fate of Bannon where he is being charged?
Kathaal: Jewish.
Well, there is determined, in the first place an irony, Ari, in between when you have tried to commit Roger Stone and Alex Jones a big lie - claims that the Democrats have committed a great lie..
I think the most important point about the summons and the way in which the Bannon persecution relates are really two things about what the Ministry of Merrick Garland has done.The first bannon did not accuse the Bannon as a complicated legal document that is difficult for Americans.is common, common English.
Everyone can pick it up and read and say that Bannon is just afraid of telling the truth.A beautiful jury.Garland didn't do that.
He reported earlier and asked a beautiful jury by Steve Bannon's comrades to accuse him.means serious things.They come to the bottom of the truth.
In my opinion they took too long.
Melber: Yes, really interesting to break down, including your perception that part of it could have been done earlier, especially in view of the fact that it is a conference committee.
Neal Katyal, I want to thank you and remind everyone that you can always go to msnbc.com/oping arguments for these primers and sessions with adviser Neal Katyal.
Later in the program, the best-selling author and co-author James Patterson from Bill Clinton here for his first Beat interview ever.We are looking forward to.
But first this big victory for President Biden and another big mood that comes down the Pike.
(Commercial break)
[18:35:59]
(Start with video clips)
Rep.nancy Pelosi (D-CA): This vote is Yeas 220, no is 213. The better bill of the building is assumed.
(Cheer and applause)
(End of video clips)
Melber: you can't see it every day.
(Start with video clips)
Non -Geidified woman: On October 1, they try to accept a human infrastructure account of $ 3.5 trillion.
George Stephanopoulos, ABC News: The house has delayed a mood about Bipartisan infrastructure account.
Stephanie Ruhle, MSNBC -Gastheer: free community college out, child tax and paid family leave scaled back, and the price tag forgets $ 3.5 trillion.
Jen Psaki, press secretary in the White House: we are still openly working and negotiating.
Non -geidified man: There is a new momentum against a mood.
Not -geidified man: It seems that it will be unlikely today.
Pelosi: Today we have the honor to participate in the passing legislation for the people to rebuild better.
(End of video clips)
Melber: You go there.
It is a reminder of how these things take a long time and then people can just pass.
(Start with video clips)
Joe Biden, President of the United States: We have gone from an economy that was closed to an economy that leads the world in economic growth.
I know, for many Americans things are still very difficult, but if you look at all the facts, you can only come to a conclusion.
(End of video clips)
Melber: This new expenditure account leads to the Senate.
Now Sinema doesn't talk much.
(Start with video clips)
Leave.Nobody really does it.
(End of video clips)
Melber: Nobody knows what a walk means.A sensory explanation has never been pronounced.
Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat van California, no walking, just a friend of the beat, thank you for coming back.
Fmr.sen.barbara Boxer (D-CA): Thank you for having me on, ari.
Melber: Let's start by choosing the dealer.
We briefly put it together to think about how you can get into the daily cycle.We all do it, whether it is life that runs around and gets groceries, or God, ok, what is the latest, latest news on your phone?
But it was months in creation.And Friday seems to be a final step when they keep 50.Your opinion about some of the above?
Boxer: My thoughts are hurray.
I mean, President Biden is a good man.I know him forever.A bill so critical.
It is really a calculation from the middle class because young children could start for a long time if they were very poor, but people in the middle class if they could not afford to send their children to the private school, could not do it.Become universal kindergarten.
I remember that I sent my children to kindergarten.Your brain is 95 percent developed after the age of 5.
So what we do here - and I say that we hopefully mean the country - is to understand this and to do this accessible.Can stay in their houses if they have a health problem.
[18:40:18]
If I couldn't hear you, I couldn't be in your show.And I am lucky to hear you.But what if I couldn't pay $ 2,000, $ 5,000 for hearing aids?, there is in it.And in the end you focus on climate change, it is a scream for the young people.Creates jobs, jobs, jobs.
So I'm excited.If you are not sure.
(Latter)
Melber: Well, you know better than most, after you have been an insider there for a long time, as mentioned.
You mentioned a lot of what is in the bill, what is interesting, senator because you, as you say, absolutely hearing aids.Will be able to hear as long as I am on earth.
You mentioned climate costs.
And then there are many things here.In the lifespan of many people who are now on earth.
The other that I will observe because I didn't know what you would answer, but you did that now, you seem to talk about the real interests that people are concerned with Axelrod and some of the others who have said Obamafolk that they should be thatThey must be more of focus.
I want to read you what he said about how, although the bill is large, he doesn't think that is what you take with you when you talk to the audience.
He says: "Democrats must stop referring to this thing as huge, historically, transforming and, instead, emphasizing how it reacts" - all caps - that means he calls - "to some of the daily challenges that people face,Practical answers to problems in real life as the costs of childcare.
Well, some people, such as that transformation corner, before they talk about it because they went to the congress to do big things.
But as a senator, with all the experience you have, do you agree that most or many voters and voters look at what he says?
Boxer: Well, I think we should pay attention to David Axelrod.He is really brilliant when it comes to winning campaigns.
For me I just wanted to go to the people and tell him what is in the bill.That it is not nice if you can send your child to kindergarten and it is free instead of putting a lot of money aside?
Win not well that grandma can get her hearing aids.Is it not getting great that prescription drugs are lowered?So I agree with him to forget these big words.For when the budget agency of the congress does - it will be a fact.
So it will not add inflation?There is a great Hebrew number that you look at a holiday.Be enough if he did one.
And although this does four or five things that are really extraordinary.Bar one would be enough.So I'm enthusiastic about this.smart.
Melber: Sad, my heart, was life.
Senator Boxer ...
(Latter)
Boxer: So.
Melber: ... always good to see you.
Boxer: Back to you.
Melber: branch.We are seen again.
When we get up, we have something special.Who is one of the most reliable writers on earth.I will explain why.
James Patterson next.
(Commercial break)
[18:48:48]
Melber: As a health case, Covid fades over many parts of America.But like a storyline, yes, it just starts to start.
There are shows and films that "Gray’s Anatomy" or "Songbird" weaving the Pandemie on the site for people to Binge.
James Patterson, who has sold more than 300 million books around the world.", An audio book, an audio book with John Lithgow.
Pattersons have been clearly busy.We must mention that he also writes a novel with Dolly Parton.
But he is in the news tonight, yes, new projects, as mentioned, this new book with real stories that follow heroes that Maxwell Reusen.
He is clearly a writer who is able to conquer some of the patoses and absurdities in fiction and then the rawness or reality of non -fiction.
(Start with video clips)
Bill Clinton, former President of the United States: What I wanted to know is when I am a Glupian consumer of thrillers and I am 35 years old, I call him and say: "Jim, it has been 30 pages since we killed someone.
[18:50:07]
(Latter)
James Patterterson, award -winning novelist: when I write with the president, some things can be exaggerated, even if nothing is in the top nowadays.
But the president ensures that if that happened, that would happen.
(End of video clips)
Melber: nothing about the top nowadays.
Together with bestseller author, we are the co-author of the president, as mentioned, and for the other a nine times Emmy winner, James Patterterson.
Thank you for being on the beat.
Patterson: You let me sound busy.I'm tired of listening to it.
(Latter)
Melber: Imagine those among us who try to do one thing a day here.
But yes, I know you are clearly great.
Patterson: One.
Well, we are celebrating Alex Cross today, but the nurses are - it is an interesting book, like all of us - all of us - all nurses we love, but we don't really understand what they do.
As an example, we just sold the nurses to one of the networks.Said, oh, my God, there is nothing similar on TV because we don't put the right nurses in it.
And it's just - the book bursts all the spirits.Take in five minutes with the patient.The nurse is there all day.
Melber: How do you get to the nurse's mindset?
Patterson: Well, this is - I now do one to the police.My friend, Matt Eversmann, and he does the interviews and he is just a great interviewer.
He was actually depicted the sergeant in "Black Hawk Down", the real guy.And he is just stories from people.Very bad, very readable.It is not much interview.This is just history after history.
As if there is one about this nurse and she comes close to this pair and the man dies.Go, oh, my God, I can't take a dog here.But she says you know what, I'll do it.
And she brings the Golden Retriever outside.Know what nurses do.And now I do it.I understand.
Melber: What do you think the character or reader feels the most lively, the most in contact with this thing we live through?
Patterson: Well, I think it's one thing by making people feel alive because many of us, I mean, we are numb.
And you read a good book or you see a good movie or something, and suddenly you wake up a bit.
Melber: one.
Do you know what everyone wants to know about you?
Patterson: No, what?
(Latter)
Melber: Luk.do you are halfway.
Patterson: OK, what?
Melber: What is the difference between working with Dolly Parton and collaboration with Bill Clinton?
Patterson: really not much.
They are great to be with.They have become good friends, both.Dolly sang a happy birthday for me by telephone, it's - it's great, right?
They are very cooperative.Listen, because she knows what it will be like with a singer.
And in the case of President Clinton, the same in terms of, ok, the secret service would act, etc., etc.And what I love - yes, even the Alex Cross books, I mean it's really real - it's real - if the stories are exaggerated.
But if - but it is exactly in terms of whether there is something crazy.
Melber: People are afraid of violent crime.
Patterson: One.
Melber: And yet many people seem fascinated by it.
Patterson: Well, I think, whatever I do, there is closure.
It is as if it is being solved or something positive happens, or Alex - when Morgan Freeman decided to play the role, he said what I like about Alex, he is not a man he doesn't go up.Discover how you can solve things.
Melber: Right.
Patterson: he is a bit like a black Sherlock Holmes.
Melber: Let's take a look.We have some morgan freeman.se.
Patterson: Okay.
[18:55:00]
(Start with video clips)
Morgan Freeman, actor: I am a forensic psychology.
(End of video clips)
Melber: If you write, you always know who ...
Patterterson: Here I say how smart he is and you show all this from people blowing things up.
(Latter)
Melber: Hello, we're just ...
Patterson: That's the film.
(Overkooking)
Melber: Hello, you are the author.We are just TV people here.
(Overkooking)
Patterson: It was not in the book.
Melber: Last question I would ask.
Speaking as a writer during an adjustment.
The last thing I should ask you is when you write, are you thinking with whom the typical reader will identify?Does it have to be someone who ultimately has something good or not necessarily?
Patterson: I just have something simple.
That's how it is.
(Latter)
Melber: Wow.I buy it.
James Patterson ...
(Overkooking)
Patterson: Thank you.
Melber: Oh, it was great.
Patterson: Apart from the madman that blow the things you showed there.
(Latter)
Melber: I like to have you back.
You will be read broadly.
Patterson: Maybe there are.These are two brains.
Melber: Well, there is left and a right brain.
James Patterson, Tak.
Patterson: Thank you.
Melber: I want to remind people that if you are interested, that one book I mentioned is "E.R. Nurses: True Stories from America's greatest unjesh heroes" and a book that will have no explosions in it, "fear nothing bad"
We will be right back.
(Commercial break)
Melber: Thank you for seeing the beat.
"Reidout Med Joy Reid" starter now.
