Criteria for choosing a series of leading health indicators (2024)

Healthy people 2030Contains three types of goals - core, development and research.Tone -style health indicators (LHIS)Healthy people 2030will be drawn from the core objectives because the core objectives are defined as having valid, reliable and timely data sources and evidence -based interventions so that their goals can be achieved.Healthy people 2030Lhis that is informed byHealthy people 2030Frames, including the vision, mission, basic principles, general goals and action plan.

PHASE 1

All core objectives must be evaluated on the following four criteria:

1.

The burden of public health- Relative significance for the health and the good of the nation;

2.

The size of the health differenceIndegree, in which health reason would be obtainedWhen the target is achieved;

3.

To what extent is the target oneWatchmenofCalling law;In

4.

ActionFrom the target.

Reasons

In phase 1, four criteria are used on the core objectives.The burden of public health, classically is indicated by important measurements such as surplus morbidity and mortality.However, armies can be considered at first sight as a low public health burden (eg low levels of selected infectious diseases) because of current practice (eg vaccinations).For this reason, the liability of public health should also be assessed whether it would be important if the current practice would not be continued.Healthy people 2030That is "to" improve the efforts of the nation to improve the health and good of all people ", to strengthen and evaluate."

The second criterion focuses onThe size of the health difference and the extent to which health reason would be achieved if the LHI target were achieved.

The third criterion emphasizes the role of LHIs in serving as aWatchmenInCalling lawFor the state of the health of the nation and as a warning or examples of threats.This criterion supportsHealthy people 2030Action plan to "provide data that can encourage targeted actions to tackle regions and population poor health or a high risk of poor health in the future."

Action, the final criterion is versatile.and achieving the health and well-being of the nation is a shared responsibility that is divided over the national, national, sample and social levels, including the sectors of the public, private and non-profit organizations, "and the Action Plan"to develop affordable resources and to make health promotion, disease prevention and treatment. "

Description of the application

Phase 1 is a targeted assessment that applies a set of four criteria to every core objectiveHealthy people 2030.Criteria ranging from 4 (least important) to 40 (more importantly).Disse core objective with the highest ranked scores would be considered as candidates for the pool of possible LHIs forHealthy people 2030.

Level 2

The pole of possible LHIs that come from phase 1 would then be exposed to a further series of criteria before the last LHIs forHealthy people 2030has been selected.Phase 2 criteria must be used with the important assumption that the LHIs must be seen as a group.

  • LHIs represent a balanced portfolio or coherent set of health and good in life.

  • LHIS is in balance between common, river root causes of poor health and good action and goals for health states with a high fiority.

  • The LHIs are available for political, environmental and system interventions on local, state, tribal and national level.

  • LHIS is understandable and will resonate with different stakeholders to stimulate action.

Reasons

Considerations for phase 2 strengthen the basic principles thatHealthy people 2030is based.Healthy people 2030Vision "a society where all people can reach their full potential for health and well-being"- with the intention of achieving life without preventive disease, disability, injury and premature death.Measurements of health states with a high stove in the last set of LHIs can be led by the basic principle that "healthy physical, social and economic environments reinforce the potential to achieve health and well."The importance of LHIs as a series of resonants with different stakeholders to intervene., including the sectors of the public, private and non-profit organizations, "and the Central CentralHealthy people 2030as "a part of decision -making and political formulation in all sectors."

Description of the application

Unlike the core objectives, LHIs does not exist separately.LHIs as a whole.Since different sets of potential LHIs are built in this phase, it is probably recommended to find iterative movement between phase 1 and phase 2 until the last set of LHIS is selected, for example.Shown in the first phase 1 process, the power-growing root causes of poor health and well-being and goals for health states with high priority cannot sufficiently balance.

1

Source: Report of the Advisory Committee of the SecretaryRecommendations for the leading health indicators.

Criteria for choosing a series of leading health indicators (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Errol Quitzon

Last Updated:

Views: 6061

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (59 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Errol Quitzon

Birthday: 1993-04-02

Address: 70604 Haley Lane, Port Weldonside, TN 99233-0942

Phone: +9665282866296

Job: Product Retail Agent

Hobby: Computer programming, Horseback riding, Hooping, Dance, Ice skating, Backpacking, Rafting

Introduction: My name is Errol Quitzon, I am a fair, cute, fancy, clean, attractive, sparkling, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.