Alternative bedding materials for poultry: availability, effectiveness and significant limitations (2024)

1.Embury IS.Alternative waste materials for poultry. (2004) Available online at:https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/134446/Alternative-litter-materials-for-poultry.pdf(accessed January 13, 2021).

2.Plantz B.Take a look at the WATT Executive Guide to World Poultry Trends.(2013) Available online at:https://www.wattagnet.com/articles/17177-new-look-for-watt-executive-guide-to-world-poultry-trends(Accessed January 13, 2021).

3.Davis JD, Purswell J, Columbus EP, Kiess A.Evaluation of mown switchgrass as soil material.Int J Poult Sci.(2010) 9. 10.3923/ijps.2010.39.42 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

4.Garcês A, Afonso SMS, Chilundo A, Jairoce CTS.Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a warm and humid environment: 1. Characteristics and quality of the litter.J Appl Poultry Res.(2013)22:168-76. 10.3382/japr.2012-00547 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

5.Ramadan SG, Mahboub HD, Helal MA, Gaafar KM.Behavior, welfare and performance of broiler chickens raised on different litter materials.Assistant vet with J.(2013)59:9-18. 10.21608/avmj.2013.171599 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

6.Charles EB.Waste management for caged turkeys. Charlotte, NC: North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service; (2005).[Google Scholar]

7.Labelle ER, Jaeger D.Soil compaction caused by logging and possible short-term natural recovery of soil density.Soil Science Soc Am J.(2011)75:2314-29. 10.2136/sssaj2011.0109 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

8.Hruza P, Pelikán P, Blahuta J, Nedorost J, Patocka Z.A structural reinforcement layer with wood chips used on forest roads.New mechanization of forestry.(2016)37:25–34. Available online at:https://hrcak.srce.hr/17380I [Google Scholar]

9.Walter H, Walter-Gurzeler LM.Coated free aggregate can be used in wood concrete technology and its production method.(1991) Available online at:https://patents.google.com/patent/US5019170A/da(accessed January 13, 2021).

10.Xing Z, Djelal C, Vanhove Y, Kada H.Wood waste in concrete blocks produced by vibrocompression.Environmental process.(2015)2:223-32. 10.1007/s40710-015-0104-4 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

11.Osei D, Jackson E.Compressive strength of concrete with sawdust as aggregate.Int J Sci Eng Res.(2016)7:1349-53.[Google Scholar]

12.Okoroafor S, Onukwugha O, Onukwugha E, Anyaogu L, Adah E.Structural properties of sawdust-sand-cement composite.Int J Adv Res Technol.(2017)6:173-80.[Google Scholar]

13.Sikkema R, Steiner M, Junginger M, Hiegl W, Hansen MT, Faaij A.The European wood pellet markets: current status and prospects for 2020.Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefinery.(2011)5:250-78. 10.1002/bbb.277 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

14.Almeida Paz ICL, Garcia RG, Bernardi R, Nääs IA, Caldara FR, Freitas LW, et al..Selection of suitable litter to reduce movement problems in broilers.Brazil J Poultry Sci.(2010)12:189–95. 10.1590/S1516-635X2010000300008 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

15.Malone GW, Chaloupka GW, Saylor WW.Influence of litter type and size on broiler performance: 1. Factors influencing litter consumption1.Poult Sc.(1983)62:1741-6. 10,3382/pk.0621741 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

16.Benabdeljelil K, Ayachi A.Evaluation of alternative waste materials for poultry.J Appl Poultry Res.(1996)5:203-9. 10.1093/japr/5.3.203 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

17.Torok VA , Hughes RJ , Ophel-Keller K , Ali M , Macalpine R .Influence of different litter materials on the colonization of the cecal microbiota in broilers.Poult Sc.(2009)88:2474-81. 10.3382/ps.2008-00381 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

18.Sheffield CL, Crippen TL, Beier RC.Multimicrobial compounds eliminate or reduce Salmonella Typhimurium in one-third of poultry liter samples within 8 days.Res J Poultry Sci.(2018)11:5–8. 10.36478/rjpscience.2018.5.8 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

19.Singh T, Rashikhopha E, Dayal P, Matuka O, Baatjies R, et al.Risk factors associated with allergic sensitization and asthma phenotypes in poultry farm workers.Ben J In Med.(2018)61:515-23. 10.1002/ajim.22841 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

20.Garcia R, Paz ICLA, Caldara FR, Nääs IA, Bueno L, Freitas L, et al..Waste products and the prevention of carcass lesions in broilers.Braz J Poultry Sci.(2012)14:27–32. 10.1590/S1516-635X2012000100005 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

21.Heiner AP, Teleman O.Interface between monoclinic crystalline cellulose and water: breakdown of the odd/even duality.Langmuir.(1997)13:511-8. 10.1021/la960886d [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

22.Chami Khazraji A, Robert S.Self-assembly and intermolecular forces when cellulose and water interact using molecular modeling.J Nanomater.(2013)2013:e745979. 10.1155/2013/745979 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

23.Lindh EL.Cellulose-water interaction: a spectroscopic study. (2016). Available online at:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-199200(accessed June 19, 2021).

24.Traldi AB, Oliveira MC de, Duarte KF, Moraes VMB de.Evaluation of probiotics in the feed of broilers raised on virgin or recycled waste.Brazilian Journal of Zootechnics.(2007)36:660–5. 10.1590/S1516-35982007000300020 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

25.Ferrante V, Lolli S, Marelli S, Vezzoli G, Sirri F, Cavalchini LG.Effect of light programs, bird densities and litter types on the welfare of broilers. I:EPC 2006 - 12th European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy, 10-14 September 2006. (2006) Available online at:https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093210273(accessed January 12, 2021)

26.Shields SJ, Garner JP, Mench JA.Effect of sand and wood shavings on the behavior of broilers.Poult Sc.(2005)84:1816-24. 10.1093/ps/84.12.1816 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

27.Carr LE, Mallinson ET, Tate CR, Miller RG, Russek-Cohen E, Stewart LE, et al.The occurrence of salmonella in broiler flocks: effect of litter water activity, stable construction and drinking installations.Vogel Dis.(1995)39:39-44. 10.2307/1591980 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

28.Chinivasagam HN, Redding M, Runge G, Blackall PJ.Presence and prevalence of foodborne pathogens in Australian chicken litter.Brother Poult Sci. (2010)51:311-8. 10.1080/00071668.2010.499424 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

29.Wilkinson KG, Tee E, Tomkins RB, Hepworth G, Premier R.Effect of heating and aging of poultry manure on the persistence of intestinal bacteria.Poult Sc.(2011)90:10–8. 10.3382/ps.2010-01023 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

30.Adele A, Tewolde H, Sistani KR, Rowe DE.Broiler fertilization and cultivation system influence soil properties.Agron J.(2009)101:1304-10. 10.2134/agronj2009.0150 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

31.Steenfeldt S, Engberg RG, Kjær J.Feeding roughage to laying hens affects egg production, gastrointestinal parameters and mortality. I:Feeding roughage to laying hens affects egg production, gastrointestinal parameters and mortality. Belgium: Blankenberge; (2001). s. 238-9.[Google Scholar]

32.Diarra SS.Poultry industries in the South Pacific: issues and future directions.World Poultry Sci J.(2017)73:293-300. 10.1017/S0043933916001070 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

33.Huang Y, Yoo JS, Kim HJ, Wang Y, Chen YJ, Cho JH, et al..Effect of litter types and different nutrient densities on growth performance, intestinal weight and blood characteristics in broilers.J Appl Poultry Res.(2009)18:1-7. 10.3382/japr.2007-00069 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

34.Kaukonen E, Norring M, Valros A.Evaluation of the Effects of Litter Material and Raised Platforms on Contact Dermatitis and Plumage Cleanliness in Commercial Broilers and on Litter Conditions in Broiler Houses.Brother Poult Sci.(2017)58:480-9. 10.1080/00071668.2017.1340588 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

35.Gençoglan S, Gençoglan C.The effect of waste on the welfare and performance of broiler chickens.Tyrkisk J Agric Food Scientific Technol.(2017)5:1660-7. 10.24925/turjaf.v5i12.1660-1667.1736 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

36.Bilgili SF, Hess JB, Blake JP, Macklin KS, Saenmahayak B, Sibley JL.Influence of litter on footpad dermatitis in broilers.J Appl Poultry Res.(2009)18:583-9. 10.3382/japr.2009-00023 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

37.Beagle EC, Fao R, (Italy) ASD eng.Conversion of rice husks into energy.(1978) Available online at:https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2016016371(accessed January 11, 2021).

38.Muthayya S, Sugimoto J, Montgomery S, Maberly G.An overview of global rice production, supply, trade and consumption.Ann NY Acad Sci.(2014)1324:7-14. 10.1111/nyas.12540 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

39.Mistry B.Properties and industrial uses of rice husks. From the editor's office.Int J Eng Sci Comput.(2016)6:2677-9.[Google Scholar]

40.Ahsan MB, Hossain Z.Use of Rice Husk Ash (RHA) as a durable cementitious material for concrete structures.In: Struble L, Tebaldi G. editors.Materials for sustainable infrastructure Sustainable civil infrastructure. Cham: Springer Internationale Publishing; ) (2018). S. 197-210. 10.1007/978-3-319-61633-9_12 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

41.Abbas A, Ansumali S.Global potential of rice husks as a renewable raw material for the production of ethanol-based biofuels.Bioenergi Res.(2010)3:328-34. 10.1007/s12155-010-9088-0 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

42.Ranum P, Peña-Rosas JP, Garcia-Casal MN.Global maize production, use and consumption.Ann NY Acad Sci.(2014)1312:105-12. 10.1111/nyas.12396 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

43.BoŽović I, Radosavljević M, Žilić S, Jovanović R.A genetic basis for the use of corn cobs as a valuable natural renewable resource.Genetic.(2004)36:245-56. 10.2298/GENSR0403245B [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

44.Cao Q, Xie KC, Lv YK, Bao W-R.Process effects on high specific surface area activated carbon from corn cobs.Bioresour technology.(2006)97:110–5. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.026 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

45.Pinto J, Cruz D, Paiva A, Pereira S, Tavares P, Fernandes L, et al.Characterization of corn cobs as a possible construction raw material.Building material.(2012)34:28–33. 10.1016/j.bouwmat.2012.02.014 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

46.Arun K, Ramanan MV.Experimental studies on corn cob gasification in a fixed bed system.J Chem Pharm Res.(2016)8:667-76.[Google Scholar]

47.Menon V, Rao M.Trends in lignocellulosic bioconversion: biofuels, platform chemicals and biorefinery concept.Prog Energy Combustion Sci.(2012)38:522-50. 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.02.002 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

48.VN-middle.Sand, rarer than people think: UNEP Global Environmental Alert Service (GEAS) - March 2014.(2014) Available online at:https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/handle/20.500.11822/8665(accessed January 13, 2021)

49.Che J, Wang D, Liu H, Zhang Y.Mechanical properties of desert sand-based fiber concrete (DS-FRC).Application Science.(2019)9:1857. 10.3390/app9091857 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

50.Wang Y, Yan P, Han G, Wu W, Zhang R.Sand source and formation mechanism of river dunes: a case study in Xiangshui River, China.J Dry land.(2019)11:525-36. 10.1007/s40333-019-0102-x [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

51.Camara AY, Keita A, Li H, Keita SM.Impact of mining by a Russian company on renewable natural resources in Fria Prefecture, Republic of Guinea.J Environmental pollution Human health.(2018)6:7–19. 10.12691/jephh-6-1-2 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

52.Fleury N, Lahaye M.Chemical and physicochemical characterization of fibersLaminaria fingers(kombu breton): a physiological approach.J Sci Food Agric.(1991)55:389-400. 10.1002/jsfa.2740550307 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

53.Boulos NN, Greenfield H, Wills R.Water holding capacity of selected soluble and insoluble dietary fibers.Int J Food property.(2000)3:217-31. 10.1080/10942910009524629 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

54.Melati RB, Schmatz AA, Pagnocca FC, Contiero J, Brienzo M.Sugarcane bagasse: production, composition, properties and raw material potential. Available online at:https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/174692(accessed December 11, 2018).

55.Teixeira AS, de Oliveira MC, Menezes JF, Gouvea BM, Teixeira SR, Gomes AR.Poultry litter from wood shavings and/or sugar cane bagasse: animal performance and litter quality.Colombian Journal of Animal Sciences.(2015)28:238-46. 10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n3a4 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

56.Mozes I, Said L, Yunus K, Abubakar UB, Wakawa AM.Selection, management and use of poultry litter in Nigeria.Asian J Poultry Scis.(2012)6:44–55. 10.3923/ajpsaj.2012.44.55 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

57.Burke GB, Pescatore AJ, Cantor AH, Straw ML, Xiangbai H, Johnson TH.Newspaper as bedding material and its effect on broiler performance1.J Appl Poultry Res.(1993)2:154-8. 10.1093/japr/2.2.154 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

58.Lien RJ, Hess JB, Conner DE, Wood CW, Shelby RA.Peanut shells as a waste source for broiler replacement.Poult Sc.(1998)77:41–6. 10.1093/ps/77.1.41 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

59.Caselli M, de Gennaro G, Saracino MR, Tutino M.Indoor pollutants from newspapers: VOC emissions in newsstands.Middle Res.(2009)109:149-57. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.10.011 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

60.Zhou RX, Stanley R, Le M.Contamination of food with newspaper ink: an evidence-based case study (EIDM) of homemade dessert.Environmental Health Rev.(2012)55:63–9. 10.5864/d2012-005 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

61.Mohammadi Torkashvand A, Alidoust M, Mahboub Khomami A.Reuse of organic peanut waste as a growing medium for ornamental plants.Int J Recycle Org Waste Agriculture.(2015)4:85-94. 10.1007/s40093-015-0088-0 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

62.Maití RK, Wesche-Ebeling P.The groundnut crop (Arachis hypogaea). undefined.(2002) Available online at:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-peanut-(Arachis-hypogaea)-crop-Mait%C3%AD-Wesche-Ebeling/b371d6d3c6b329e8b5f225ea13c7e9d7c0d1d737(accessed January 13, 2021).

63.USDA.Foreign Agricultural Service.(2016) Available online at:https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/(accessed January 12, 2021).

64.Davis JP, Dean LL.Composition, taste and nutrition of peanuts.Pinda's. (2016)11:289-345. 10.1016/B978-1-63067-038-2.00011-3 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

65.Hamm W, Hamilton RJ, Calliauw G. editors.Processing of edible oil. 2. udg. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; (2013). 10.1002/9781118535202 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

66.Kerr TJ, Windham WR, Woodward JH, Benner R.Chemical composition andin vitrodigestibility of thermochemically treated peanut shells.J Sci Food Agric.(1986)37:632-6. 10.1002/jsfa.2740370706 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

67.Watts DB, Hess JB, Bilgili SF, Torbert HA, Sibley JL, Davis JD.Flue gas desulfurization gypsum: its effectiveness as an alternative litter material for broiler production.J Appl Poultry Res.(2017)26:50–9. 10.3382/japr/pfw045 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

68.Diarra SS, Neiubi S, Lesumairotorua J, Verau L.Evaluation of paragrass (Urochloa mutica) as bedding material for laying hens.Res Opin Veterinary Medicine Sci.(2014)4:560-3.[Google Scholar]

69.Grimes JL, Smithi J, Williams CM.Some alternative waste materials used for growing broilers and turkeys.World Poultry Sci J.(2002)58:515-26. 10.1079/WPS20020037 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

70.Rohrig KL.The physiological effects of dietary fiber - an overview.Crazy Hydrocoll.(1988)2:1-18. 10.1016/S0268-005X(88)80033-X [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

71.Schneeman BO.Dietary fiber and gastrointestinal function.Feed things.(1998)18:625-32. 10.1016/S0271-5317(98)00049-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

72.Coblentz WK, Turner JE, Scarbrough DA, Lesmeister KE, Johnson ZB, Kellogg DW, et al..Storage properties and nutritional changes of bermudagrass hay as influenced by moisture content and density of rectangular bales.Crop Sci.(2000)40:1375-83. 10.2135/cropsci2000.4051375x [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

73.Turner JE, Coblentz WK, Scarbrough DA, Rhein RT, Coffey KP, Johnson ZB, et al..Changes in the nutritional value of tall fescue hay as influenced by natural rainfall and moisture concentration at baling.Anim Feed Scientific Technol.(2003)109:47-63. 10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00209-8 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

74.Foley KM.Chemical properties, physical properties and uses of Andersons corn on the cob products. Andersons, Cob Division, Processing Group; (1978).[Google Scholar]

75.Koenig RT, Palmer MD, Jr FDM, Miller BE, Harrison JD.Chemical changes and process controls to reduce ammonia volatilization during internal composting.Compost Sci Util.(2005)13:141-9. 10.1080/1065657X.2005.10702231 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

76.Sheng J, Adeli A, Miles DM.Effects of N and P immobilizers on ammonia emissions and nutrient content in broilers.JSM Environ Sci Ecol.(2015)3:8.[Google Scholar]

77.Watts D, Runion B, Purswell J, Torbert A, Davis J.The effects of FGD gypsum waste on the gas losses of a broiler flock.Int J Poult Sci.(2020)19:42–50. 10.3923/ijps.2020.42.50 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

78.Weaver WD, Meijerhof R.The effect of different levels of relative humidity and air movement on soil conditions, ammonia levels, growth and carcass quality of broiler chickens.Poult Sc.(1991)70:746-55. 10.3382/pk.0700746 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

79.Reece FN, Lott BD, Deaton JW.Atmospheric ammonia during incubation affects broiler chicken performance.Poult Sc.(1980)59:486-8. 10,3382/p.0590486 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

80.Deaton JW, Reece FN, Lott BD.Effect of atmospheric ammonia on chickens at the laying site.Poult Sc.(1984)63:384-5. 10.3382/pk.0630384 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

81.Miles DM, Branton SL, Lott BD.Atmospheric ammonia is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial broiler chickens.Poult Sc.(2004)83:1650-4. 10.1093/ps/83.10.1650 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

82.Kim WK, Anderson RC, Ratliff AL, Nisbet DJ, Ricke SC.Growth inhibition by nitro compounds of selected uric acid-consuming microorganisms isolated from poultry manure.J Environment Sci Health B.(2006)41:97-107. 10.1080/03601230500234950 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

83.Maheshwari S.Environmental impacts of poultry production.Poultry fishing Wildlife Sci. (2013)1:1-2. 10,4172/pfw.1000101 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

84.Nagaraja KV, Emery DA, Jordan KA, Newman JA, Pomeroy BS.Scanning electron microscopic studies of the adverse effects of ammonia on tracheal tissue in turkeys.Ben J Vet Res.(1983)44:1530-6. [PubMed][Google Scholar]

85.Nagaraja K, Emery D, Jordan K, Sivanandan V, Newman JA, Pomeroy BS.Effect of ammonia on the quantitative clearance ofEscherichia colifrom the lungs, air sacs and livers of aerosol-vaccinated turkeysEscherichia coli.Ben J Vet Res.(1984)45:392-5. [PubMed][Google Scholar]

86.Munir MT.Epidemiology and management strategies for Johne's disease in endemic situations.Res J Vets.(2014)2:84-90. 10.14737/journal.rjvp/2014/2.5.84.90 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

87.Park JH, Kim IH.Additional effect of probiotic Bacillus subtilis B2A on productivity, organ weight, intestinal microflora and breast meat quality in growing broilers.Poult Sc.(2014)93:2054-9. 10.3382/ps.2013-03818 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

88.Sharma NK, Choct M, Wu S, Swick RA.Nutritional effects on odor emissions in broiler production.World Poultry Sci J.(2017)73:257-80. 10.1017/S0043933917000046 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

89.Cabrera ML, Kissel DE, Hassan S, Rema JA, Cassity-Duffey K.The litter type and number of flocks influence sex hormones in broilers.J Ca.(2018)47:156-61. 10.2134/jeq2017.08.0301 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

90.Meda B, Hassouna M, Aubert C, Robin P, Dourmad JY.Influence of rearing conditions and manure management practices on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from poultry houses.World Poultry Sci J.(2011)67:441-56. 10.1017/S0043933911000493 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

91.Monira KN, Islam MA, Alam MJ, Wahid MA.Effect of waste materials on broiler performance and evaluation of the fertilization value of spent waste in late autumn.Asian-Australian J Anim Sci.(2003)16:555-7. 10.5713/ajas.2003.555 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

92.Toghyani M, Gheisari A, Modaresi M, Tabeidian SA, Toghyani M.Effect of different litter materials on broiler performance and behavior.Appl Anim Gedrag Sci.(2010)122:48–52. 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.11.008 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

93.Munir MT, Belloncle C, Irle M, Federighi M.Wood-based waste in poultry production: an overview.World Poultry Sci J.(2019)75:5–16. 10.1017/S0043933918000909 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

94.Nowaczewski S, Rosiński A, Markiewicz M, Kontecka H.Performance, footpad dermatitis and hemoglobin saturation in broilers on different types of litter.Archives of Poultry Sciences.(2011)75:132-9.[Google Scholar]

95.Petek M, ÇIbIk R, YIldIz H, Sonat FA, Gezen SS, Orman A, et al..The influence of different lighting programs, stocking rates and litter numbers on the welfare and productivity characteristics of a commercial broiler line.Veterinary and zootechnics.(2010) 36-43.[Google Scholar]

96.Skomorucha I, Muchacka R, Sosnówka-Czajka E, Herbut E.Response of broilers from three genetic groups to different stocking densities.Ann Dierenwetenschap.(2009)9:175-84.[Google Scholar]

97.Uzum MH, Bulk-HD.Effects of stocking rate and feed restrictions on performance, carcass, meat quality and some stress parameters in broilers under heat stress.Journal of Veterinary Medicine.(2013)164:546-54.[Google Scholar]

98.Shao D, He J, Lu J, Wang Q, Chang L, Shi SR, et al..Effects of sawdust thickness on yellow broiler growth performance, environmental conditions and welfare quality.Poult Sc.(2015)94:1-6. 10.3382/pk/peu003 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

99.Jones FT, Wineland MJ, Parsons JT, Hagler WM.Degradation of aflatoxin in poultry manure.Poult Sc.(1996)75:52–8. 10.3382/pk.0750052 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

100.Tilley BJ, Barnes HJ, Scott R, Rives DV, Brewer CE, Gerig T, et al..Litter and commercial turkey trunks affect focal ulcerative dermatitis ("breast buds").J Appl Poultry Res.(1996)5:39-50. 10.1093/japr/5.1.39 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

101.Taherparvar G, Seidavi A, Asadpour L, Payan-Carreira R, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V.Effect of litter treatment on growth performance, intestinal development and selected caecal microbiota in broilers.Brazilian Journal of Zootechnics.(2016)45:257-64. 10.1590/S1806-92902016000500008 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

102.Burt CD, Cabrera ML, Rothrock MJ, Kissel DE.Effects of flue gas desulfurization patch on urea-degrading bacteria and ammonia volatilization in broilers.Poult Sc.(2017)96:2676-83. 10.3382/ps/pex044 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

103.Oliveira MC de, Almeida CV, Andrade DO, Rodrigues SMM.Dry matter content, pH and evaporated ammonia of chicken manure, whether or not treated with various additives.R BH's Zootec.(2003)32:951–4. 10.1590/S1516-35982003000400022 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

104.Sampaio MAPM, Schocken-Iturrino RP, Sampaio AAM, Berchielli SCP, Biondi A.Research into the microbial population and ammonia release from chicken manure treated with agricultural gypsum.Arq bras with veterinarian Zootec.(1999)51:559-64. 10.1590/S0102-09351999000600010 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

105.Grimes JL, Carter TA, Godwin JL.Use of litter material made from cotton waste, plaster and old newspaper for broiler rearing.Poult Sc.(2006)85:563-8. 10.1093/ps/85.3.563 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

106.Wyatt CL, Goodman TN.Research note: The use of recycled boards (refined gypsum) as waste material for broilers1.Poult Sc.(1992)71:1572-6. 10,3382/pk.0711572 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

107.Mijinyawa Y, Dlamini BJ.Waste management from livestock and poultry in Swaziland.Vee Res Rural Dev.(2006) 18. Retrieved from:http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/6/miji18088.htm

108.Völkel I, Schmitz C, Moors E, Gauly M, Czerny CP.The frequency of detection of salmonella in a broiler flock depending on different litter materials - a field study.Veterinary weekly schedule of Berl Munch.(2011)124:71-7. [PubMed][Google Scholar]

109.Hill GM.Peanut byproducts fed to livestock.Dyrlæge Clin North Am Food Animal Practice.(2002)18:295-315. 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00019-1[PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

110.Ouhida I, Pérez JF, Piedrafita J, Gasa J.The effects of sepiolite in broilers with high, medium and low viscosity. productive performance and nutritional value.Anim Feed Scientific Technol.(2000)85:183-94. 10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00148-6 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

111.Berg L, Pluske JR, Hampson DJ.A review of the interactions between dietary fiber and the intestinal mucosa and their implications for digestion in young non-ruminants.Anim Feed Scientific Technol.(2003)108:95-117. 10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00163-9 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

112.Dikeman CL, Jr. (2010). GCF.Viscosity related to dietary fiber: an overview.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr.(2006)46:649-63. 10.1080/10408390500511862 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

113.Schøyen HF, Hetland H, Rouvinen-Watt K, Skrede A.Growth performance and ileal and total digestibility of amino acids in broilers fed diets containing natural gas produced bacterial proteins.Poult Sc.(2007)86:87-93. 10.1093/ps/86.1.87 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

114.Wang L, Newman RK, Newman CW, Hofer PJ.Barley beta-glucans alter intestinal viscosity and reduce plasma cholesterol concentrations in chickens.J Nutr.(1992)122:2292-7. 10.1093/jn/122.11.2292 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

115.Jha R, Fouhse JM, Tiwari UP, Li L, Willing BP.Dietary fiber and intestinal health in monogastric animals.Front Veterinary Sci.(2019)6:48. 10.3389/fvets.2019.00048[PMC free article][PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

116.Diarra S, Anand S.Effect of commercial feed dilution with copramel or cassava leaf meal and enzyme supplementation on broiler performance.Poult Sc.(2020)99:5867-73. 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.028[PMC free article][PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

117.Ahmad T, Sarwar M.Dietary electrolyte balance: implications in heat-stressed broilers.World's Poultry Sci J.(2006)62:638-53. 10.1017/S0043933906001188 [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

118.Atapattu NSBM, Wickramasinghe KP.The use of rejected tea as waste material for broilers.Poult Sc.(2007)86:968-72. 10.1093/ps/86.5.968 [PubMed] [CrossRef][Google Scholar]

Alternative bedding materials for poultry: availability, effectiveness and significant limitations (2024)

FAQs

Alternative bedding materials for poultry: availability, effectiveness and significant limitations? ›

Cedar shavings are not recommended because the scent can be overpowering and even toxic, especially to chicks. Straw is one of the best materials for bedding.

Which bedding material is not suitable for poultry? ›

Cedar shavings are not recommended because the scent can be overpowering and even toxic, especially to chicks. Straw is one of the best materials for bedding.

What is an alternative to poultry litter? ›

Coarse-cut sawdust or shavings provide ideal litter material for chickens if free of contaminants and properly managed. Both shavings and sawdust are available all year, usually as by-products of furniture factories, sawmilling for the building industry, and surface peelings from wood turning.

What is the best bedding to use for chickens? ›

Straw. Straw is by far the most popular chicken bedding on the market, with a whopping 43% of people telling us this is their material of choice in our latest Hensus. It's easy to get hold of, is good for insulation and provides great scratching material for your hens.

What are the three purposes of using bedding materials in poultry? ›

The bedding materials help absorb moisture, limiting the production of ammonia and harmful pathogens. The materials used for bedding can also have a significant impact on carcass quality and bird performance.

What are the pros and cons of hemp bedding for chickens? ›

Hemp bedding is also highly durable, lasting longer than traditional options. Additionally, it is dust-free, making it ideal for chickens and people. Cons: While hemp bedding boasts numerous benefits, it may be less readily available and slightly more expensive initially.

What kind of bedding is bad for chickens? ›

Fine shavings and sawdust both produce too much dust, which is not good for your chicken's lungs and leads to respiratory problems.

What are the disadvantages of poultry litter? ›

Like other animal wastes, chicken manure and litter may harbor pathogens, such as E. coli, Salmonella, Cryptosporidium and others.

What is deep litter bedding for chickens? ›

What is the Deep Litter Method? The deep litter method is a way of composting in your henhouse by letting the litter and chicken droppings build up over time. This not only makes things easier for you, the chicken keeper, but also makes it healthier for your flock.

What materials are used as litter in poultry? ›

The most commonly used materials on the floor of sheds are sawdust, wood shavings, rice hulls, straw and paper products (Table 1).

What is bedding materials for chicken? ›

Typical bedding materials in a chicken house may include: rice hulls, straw, wood chips or peanut shells. These dry, absorbent materials help keep the ground dry and soft for the chickens.

Why do chickens need bedding? ›

The bedding in the chicken coop functions to help manage droppings (chicken poop), keep the coop clean, and provides a soft and insulating flooring for your flock. So, understanding the different litter options will help you decide which litter is best for your coop.

What is easy bedding for chickens? ›

Probably the most popular poultry bedding option, wood shavings are widely available and a popular choice, available online, at local pet shops or can be made yourself if you have a wood chipper. (+) Cleaning is easy with wood shavings which can be easily raked. (+) Wood shavings are absorbent.

What are the disadvantages of wood shavings in poultry? ›

Birds might have trouble walking on material with particles that are larger than 30mm, such as crushed maize cobs, wood chips and wheat straw,” says Grobbelaar. “Material with such large particle sizes could hurt their feet and cause conditions such as bumblefoot (ulcerative pododermatitis) or breast lesions.

What is the importance of bedding materials? ›

According to studies, the appropriate bedding may enhance your sleep quality by comforting you and regulating your body temperature. Therefore, if you want to sleep better, pick the correct linens.

Why are wood shavings a choice for bedding poultry? ›

Wood shavings reduce smell as it reduces the ammonia in the air that comes out of the poultry droppings. the ammonia can be very dangerous to both chickens and the people working on the farm as it can lead to eye problems and respiratory damage.

What not to use for chicken coop bedding? ›

Rice hulls, peanut hulls, and corncobs aren't ideal for chicken bedding. They aren't as absorbent, and since they are an organic material, you have to keep on top of it and make sure the area is clean. “High mold levels and high ammonia retention make them not the best,” Byrum explains.

Which bedding material does not support bacterial growth? ›

The most common inorganic bedding source used on dairies is sand. It does not support bacterial growth very well until organic material is introduced.

Is softwood bedding safe for chickens? ›

Both softwood and hardwood shavings off-gas (or release gases) when they are taken out of their packaging. There is no research indicating that these are particularly harmful to the specialized respiratory system of chickens, regardless of their age.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Carmelo Roob

Last Updated:

Views: 6685

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Carmelo Roob

Birthday: 1995-01-09

Address: Apt. 915 481 Sipes Cliff, New Gonzalobury, CO 80176

Phone: +6773780339780

Job: Sales Executive

Hobby: Gaming, Jogging, Rugby, Video gaming, Handball, Ice skating, Web surfing

Introduction: My name is Carmelo Roob, I am a modern, handsome, delightful, comfortable, attractive, vast, good person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.